Social conservatives have their knickers in a twist over statements Dubya made in an interview with the Washington Post last Sunday. Here's the original exchange:
The Post: Do you plan to expend any political capital to aggressively lobby senators for a gay marriage amendment?
THE PRESIDENT: You know, I think that the situation in the last session -- well, first of all, I do believe it's necessary; many in the Senate didn't, because they believe DOMA [the Defense of Marriage Act] will -- is in place, but -- they know DOMA is in place, and they're waiting to see whether or not DOMA will withstand a constitutional challenge.
The Post: Do you plan on trying to -- using the White House, using the bully pulpit, and trying to --
THE PRESIDENT: The point is, is that senators have made it clear that so long as DOMA is deemed constitutional, nothing will happen. I'd take their admonition seriously.
The Post: But until that changes, you want it?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, until that changes, nothing will happen in the Senate. Do you see what I'm saying?
The Post: Right.
THE PRESIDENT: The logic.
(Side note: It cracks me up when Bush says "logic" - like he's ever used it in his life.)
Naturally, the homophobes are freaking out (here and here). My favorite quote comes from the Family Research Council's Tony Perkins (not the guy from "Psycho" - this Tony Perkins is much scarier), who said,
I believe there is no more important issue for the president's second term than the preservation of marriage.
Really, Tony? No more important issue?
The war in Iraq. Capturing Osama Bin Laden. Fixing our intelligence gathering systems so there's no repeat of the 9/11 attacks. Reducing the budget deficit. Providing affordable health care for all Americans. Improving the job market and economy.
Turns out none of those is as important as makin' sure them queers cain't git hitched!
(sigh) And they say liberals have no morals.
From his speech upon accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, just over 40 years ago:
I accept this award today with an abiding faith in America and an audacious faith in the future of mankind. I refuse to accept despair as the final response to the ambiguities of history. I refuse to accept the idea that the "isness" of man's present nature makes him morally incapable of reaching up for the eternal "oughtness" that forever confronts him.
I refuse to accept the idea that man is mere flotsom and jetsom in the river of life unable to influence the unfolding events which surround him. I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality.
I refuse to accept the cynical notion that nation after nation must spiral down a militaristic stairway into the hell of thermonuclear destruction. I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. This is why right temporarily defeated is stronger than evil triumphant.
I believe that even amid today's motor bursts and whining bullets, there is still hope for a brighter tomorrow. I believe that wounded justice, lying prostrate on the blood-flowing streets of our nations, can be lifted from this dust of shame to reign supreme among the children of men.
I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. I believe that what self-centered men have torn down, men other-centered can build up. I still believe that one day mankind will bow before the altars of God and be crowned triumphant over war and bloodshed, and nonviolent redemptive goodwill will proclaim the rule of the land.
"And the lion and the lamb shall lie down together and every man shall sit under his own vine and fig tree and none shall be afraid."
I still believe that we shall overcome.
I've always believed that, too. These days, though, I'm less certain... but Dr. King had far greater cause for doubt, yet managed to remain hopeful. Maybe that's the lesson to take away from our remembrances of him today.
Doing a bit of belated bandwagon jumping today... what the hell, the boss is out and I'm bored out of my skull.
Via Rox Populi, who got it from Mouse Words.
Guilty Pleasures
CD I have in my car that I roll up the windows to listen to
I never drive with the windows down. Too much hair blowing around in my face - I'd get myself killed, and take a few Southern Marylanders with me. But An Evening With John Denver probably warrants closing the moonroof.
Book I read flat so no one could see the title
The Rules. I read it as research for a message forum I used to moderate, but I was afraid someone would think I actually agreed with the mewling bullshit inside the covers.
Crappiest song ever sung at karaoke
All of them. Gad, I hate karaoke.
Bad movie I watch repeatedly
Running Scared. Don't ask me to explain; it's one of those unknowables.
Article of clothing I love though I know it's wrong
A black tank top that has a Bundeswehr patch on it. Remember those? I'm not generally one to promote military organizations of any ilk, but they were all the rage in the '80s... and after 20 years of laundering it's the softest, comfiest tank top I own.
What I order at the bar when no one is listening
Sweet vermouth on the rocks with a twist.
Fast food item I adore
None, these days. Trying to avoid all fast food so I can avoid having to buy new clothes. But as fast-type foods go, I gotta say I love Baja Fresh's tostada salad. And Mickey D's fries are eternal.
A TV show that is a good example of the downfall of civilization that I love anyway
Desperate Housewives. But that's OK... my devotion to The Daily Show absolves me.
The U.S. Supreme Court opted yesterday not to hear a challenge to Florida's
ban on adoptions by gays.
They offered neither comment nor dissent; they just pulled their black robes up over their heads and refused to deal with it.
According to the Washington Post article,
Like the court's recent refusal to hear a challenge to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's ruling allowing same-sex marriage in that state, yesterday's decision is not a ruling on the merits of the issue and sets no precedent.
"Not a ruling on the merits of the issue." Yeah, tell that to the gay couples who've been forbidden to adopt. Tell it to children who remain without families because homophobic Florida legislators get the willies when they see a copy of "Heather Has Two Mommies."
At present, Florida is the only state driven by its gay terror to pass such a law. But the SC's refusal to hear the case will almost certainly encourage dunderheads (and lord knows there plenty of those) in other states to introduce similar legislation.
A pox on every last one of them.