Posts tagged sexual assault

Call for submissions: sexual violence survivor stories/poetry/artwork etc

From the Souls Speak Out “About” page:

Soulspeakout.org was born out of the need for a safe space for survivors to tell their stories. Our original intent was to start a zine to distribute at local women’s shelters and support centers. However, this site has the potential to reach many more. We hope that you are able to use it as a safe space to reach out to other survivors or just have your voice heard.

This space is designed to be a healing, empowering and inspiring space for survivors of all ages, genders, sexualities, abilities, nationalities, cultural and social identities.

Feel free to contact us at any time as you explore and make this space your own.

Best wishes to Elisha, Maria, and Stefana as they build this safe space.  They’ve already made a strong start with their Resources page, so check them out and maybe submit your survivor story, if you feel it would help you or others to have it shared.


Filed under: feminism, Solidarity & Sisterhood, violence Tagged: rape, safe space, sexual violence, sexual-assault, survivors

Did Dallas Police Chief Suggest That Women Were “Asking for It?”

I think I’m the only FFC blogger living in Texas, and I couldn’t have been more outraged when current Chief of Police David Brown made comments that seemed to blame drunk women for rapes, and their friends for not protecting them. Not, you know, the rapists. This Jezebel article should give some context, and you [...]

Suggested Sunday reading (8/15/10)

Just a quick reminder, you can submit links for this column via e-mail at rosiered23 (at) sparecandy (dot) com, and you can catch up with Spare Candy on Twitter, Facebook or Tumblr as well. Or! Leave a link in the comments! Self-promotion is perfectly acceptable here.

The comic strip "Cathy," which started in 1976, is ending in October. There's a lot of love and hate for this comic. I remember reading it as a kid and enjoying it, but I haven't paid much attention to it since then. I like Broadsheet's article, "Goodbye, Cathy, feminist trailblazer." Also check out Jezebel's "How Cathy Predicted The Downfall Of Human Civilization." And Care2.org has a roundup of what some people have to say about Cathy.

In other news:

  • Washington Post: "FDA approves ella as 5-day-after emergency contraceptive." This is really good news.
  • Think Progress: "Anti-Choice Group Says Its 'Prayers' Have Been Answered When Abortion Clinic Closes Due To Doctor’s Leukemia." Oh the hypocrisy. It hurts.
  • Change.org: "Trafficked, Abused Maids in Kuwait Seek Legal Protection."
  • Los Angeles Times: "Some girls' puberty age still falling, study suggests."
  • Hello Ladies: "Have You Heard Women Make Bad Bosses?"
  • Ms. blog: "Oh SNAP! Reduced Food Stamps Are a Feminist Issue."
  • Associated Press: "First woman to head major US intelligence agency." Congrats to her!
  • The Consumerist: "Craiglist CEO Responds To Allegations The Site Is A Hub For Child Prostitution." Also check out this article on that site: "Xbox Assumes Women Contacting Them Must Be Doing It For Their 'Sons.'"
  • Broadsheet: "The great (gay) surname debate."
  • AFP: "Abortion ban leading to crisis in Philippines — rights group."
  • SAFER Blog: "Beyond the Campus: Weeks 18 & 19."
  • Colorlines: "Single Women Fend for Themselves in Recession."
  • Ms. blog: "Happy 150th Birthday, Annie Oakley!"
  • Ms. blog: "For Latinas, A Fine Line Between Reproductive Justice and Eugenics." Read this.
  • WCF Courier: "Wisconsin Diocese offers birth control insurance, but warns employees not to use it." As in they'll get fired if they do.
  • ABC: "Botox: New Trend for Teenage Girls." Umm, what??
  • Broadsheet: "Putting the 'men' in menstruation: A Japanese machine introduces males to the pain and inconvenience of periods."
  • Los Angeles Times: "French look askance at topless beachgoers." In other words, they don't want to see "old" breasts.
  • Women's Eye on Media: "Ke$ha Appropriates Native Culture Again." Just stop, please.


Suggested Sunday reading (8/1/10)

Just a quick reminder, you can submit links for this column via e-mail at rosiered23 (at) sparecandy (dot) com, and you can catch up with Spare Candy on Twitter, Facebook or Tumblr as well. Or! Leave a link in the comments! Self-promotion is perfectly acceptable here.

This was one of my favorite articles from this week: "Chelsea Clinton's big fat leaked wedding," on Broadsheet. You know, a lot is said about weddings and feminism. Like, a lot. Some people think the two can't really co-exist; others see no problem with it and embrace both at the same time. I myself (a feminist) have no real problem with weddings in and of themselves (except that not everyone can get married, I have a huge problem with that). I've never had a wedding, but I have been in wedding parties and attended more than I care to count, and some were really great! Weddings, to me, are for each couple to decide. I might not agree with some particulars, but if it's what the couple wants, who am I to say that's wrong? However, I do think the wedding industry is way out of hand, and I do think the pressure to have everything perfect is too intense. And I completely agree with this in the article: "Weddings are joyful and great. What they are not is the apotheosis of the human, the romantic or, more pointedly, the female experience."

In other news:
  • Change.org: "Belated Justice for Victims of NJ's Hair-Braiding Slavery Ring." Yes, slavery. Today. In the United States. This is happening. Read more about human trafficking in the U.S. at In These Times.
  • Ms. blog: "Forever 21′s Maternity Line: What About Corporate Responsibility?"
  • Alternet: "Right-Wingers Freak Out Over Montana Sex Ed Curriculum."
  • Alternet: "5 Stupid, Unfair and Sexist Things Expected of Men." Patriarchy hurts everyone.
  • Life magazine: "The Photo That Brought AIDS Home." Must-read, must-see.
  • Colorlines: "HIV in Poor U.S. Neighborhoods as Intense as Developing World."
  • Native American Times: "Boxer sets her sights on Olympics," about Mioshia Wagoner. Women's boxing will be an Olympic sport for the first time in 2012.
  • Hello Ladies: "Dear Mr. President," a letter to Obama after his appearance on The View.
  • Feministe: "ain’t i a mama?" If you haven't read this yet, be sure to get deep in the comments.
  • Racism Review: "Civil Rights Review: Do you know these courageous women?"
  • The Sexist posts a "Goodbye" column, which is not good news.
  • Yes Means Yes: "My Sluthood, Myself." Good read.
  • Change.org: "Clear Channel Gives Green Light for Homophobia Over Its Airwaves."
Abortion:
  • The Star-Ledger: "Gov. Christie vetoes bill restoring $7.5M grant for family planning." This is in New Jersey, and affects Planned Parenthood.
  • The Post and Courier: "Group protests Graham." That group would be Operation Rescue, and Graham is Sen. Lindsey Graham. The protest? It was a "Beating, Burning and Hanging Lindsey 'Benedict Arnold' Graham in Effigy" protest. Pro-life! Totally!
  • RH Reality Check: "Why is Washington State Flip-Flopping on Pharmacy Refusal?"
  • The Daddy Files: "Thanks Dad," a follow-up piece on the guy who recorded protesters outside a clinic when his wife had to have an abortion.
  • Feministe: "being a mother isnt always a choice, not yet."
Rape / Sexual Assault:
  • Bitch magazine: "Genderlicious: Call for Submissions to 'Dear Sister.'" Check this out; deadline to submit is Nov. 1.
  • Gawker: "StickyDrama's Owner Recorded a Live-Streamed Rape and Blogged About It—But Didn't Report It."
  • Examiner: "Court rejects religious rape defense on appeal."
  • This Ain't Livin': "Nice Guys and Behavioural Conditioning." Dealing with rape culture here.
  • Telegraph: "Palestinian jailed for rape after claiming to be Jewish."
  • Tiger Beatdown: "All Your Boobs Belong To Us: Some Thoughts About Consent While Female."
  • abyss2hope: "New Study Challenges Stereotypes of Adolescent Sex Offenders."
  • The Curvature: "President Obama to Sign Law Targeting Sexual Violence Against Native American Women."
  • Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: "Suit charges Upper St. Clair officials made rape victim 'bait.'" We're talking about a teenager here. In school.
International news:
  • Irish Times: "Sterile future for women with HIV." About women in South Africa and Namibia being coerced into sterilization.
  • IPS News: "Millennium Goal on Maternal Health in Sight." This is in Uruguay.
  • Ms. blog: "Newsflash: Mexican Women Convicted of Homicide for Abortion."
  • Daily Mail: "Striking female workers paid just £1 a day at factory which makes clothes for Gap and Adidas are beaten by riot police." This is in Cambodia.
  • Tapped: "The Little Picture: Workers' Victory in Bangladesh." Garment workers have won a raise, from $25 a month to $45 a month.
  • Time magazine: "The Plight of Afghan Women: A Disturbing Picture."
  • Huffington Post: "Teenage Girls Undergo 'Breast Ironing' In Cameroon." Because having breasts leads to pregnancy and/or sexual assault.
Pop culture:
  • Eye Weekly: "Can I have a word with you?" Secondary headline says "According to the objectionable South African electro-rap crew Die Antwoord, 'no means yes' — and their young female fans, sadly, are all too eager to sing along."
  • Hollywood Reporter: "CBS adding three gay characters to shows." How does this work? Does the network make these shows add a character?
  • The Fbomb: "Huge and Feminist Stereotypes." I agree more with the commenters (like Heather) than the original post.
  • NPR: "Sugar Pie DeSanto: After 50 Years, 'Go Going' Strong."


IL doctor allegedly assaults several female patients, may not permanently lose license

**Trigger warning for sexual assault**

Terrible news from my home state:

A 17-year-old girl reported to Berwyn police in 2003 that her doctor, Ricardo Arze, had pulled off her clothes and sexually assaulted her in his exam room, state records show.

Two years later, another patient reported to Berwyn police that Arze had placed his hands on her breasts, breathed heavily on her neck and tried to touch her genitals, claiming it would help treat depression, according to a police report.

Not until 2007 -- after at least four women had filed complaints -- did police launch the investigation that led to Arze being charged with sexually assaulting patients and having his license suspended, records show.

By that time, the family physician had allegedly assaulted at least 21 women and girls at his Arze Doctors Center in Berwyn, according to criminal and civil complaints that outline attacks stretching at least to 2000.

...That police had received allegations against Arze as early as 2003 came as a shock to one of the women who reported being abused by him in 2007.

"I am disgusted," she said of law enforcement. "They should investigate why they didn't do anything. They were accomplices."

The women said they continue to suffer trauma from the incidents. They cannot see male doctors. One has recurring dreams about her alleged attack.

Arze, who is scheduled to be in court Aug. 16, won't lose his medical license for good even if convicted of all the sexual assault and battery of patient charges.

The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation has interpreted the state Medical Practice Act to mean that it cannot permanently revoke a physician's license unless a doctor has been twice convicted of felonies involving controlled substances or public aid offenses.

A Tribune review uncovered 16 convicted sex offenders who have held Illinois medical licenses within the past 15 years. Not one had his license permanently revoked. One doctor convicted of sexually abusing a patient was never disciplined by the state in any way.

h/t

Rape on College Campuses

In March, Jaclyn Friedman wrote a great piece for the Washington Post about how rape is handled on college campuses. I love what she doing with this piece, and think it is awesome that she is bringing more attention to an incredibly important issue. However, there are a few things about the article (such as her use of gendered language) that I think missed the mark a little.

First off, the awesome stuff Jaclyn said.

I love that Jaclyn brought attention to the fact that Title IX can be utilized to ensure not only equal athletic opportunities for women in educational settings, but to prohibit sex discrimination in general. This prohibition against sex discrimination in Title IX “specifically obligates schools to prevent and remedy sexual harassment and assault.” Too many young women do not realize the broad protections of Title IX gives them the right to call bullshit (legally and otherwise) when their school does not handle their sexual assault or harassment case appropriately. I also appreciate that Jaclyn, while bringing attention to how awesome Title IX is, acknowledges how hard it can be, emotionally and otherwise, to press charges against your institution for not treating your sexual harassment or assault case appropriately.

Also, Jaclyn brought up a really interesting statistic that I never knew before: Of the more than 400,000 rapes that will likely be committed on a U.S. college campus this year, “more than 90 percent …will be committed by repeat offenders who will rape, on average, six times during their academic careers.” As horrible as these numbers are, they are, in a weird way, encouraging. In Jaclyn’s words:

That rate of recidivism is actually a golden opportunity, if only schools and courts would take it. It means that all we need to do is get serious about punishing the tiny percentage of men who are committing the vast majority of assaults, and many, many fewer women will have to live through the trauma of sexual violation.


The overall message of Jaclyn’s article: that colleges and universities need to stop trying to make themselves look better by underreporting sexual assault crimes on their campus, is also a much-needed message. Jaclyn couples this message with advice to colleges to “eliminate the ‘miscommunication’ excuse that many rapists use by creating an on-campus standard that requires any party to a sexual interaction to make sure their partner is actively enthusiastic about what's happening -not just not objecting.” This was an overarching theme in the book Yes Means Yes that she and Jessica Valenti edited, and it is a point I don’t hear made often enough.

Okay- on to me nitpicking.

Throughout her article, Jaclyn refers to rapists as “he” and rape victims as “she.” I understand that it is more likely for a woman to be raped than a man and that women are most often raped by men. However, the persistent use of gendered language is why men are
even less likely than their female counterparts to report that they have been raped. Also, gendered language further marginalizes those who have been assaulted by a member of the same gender.

Jaclyn says the fact that “Bucknell University is considering abandoning mediation as a way of adjudicating sexual assault cases” is a “small glimmer of hope that change is coming.” Obviously, mediation can be a horribly traumatic experience for a survivor to endure and the idea of an institution forcing a survivor to sit in a room with her or his rapist is disgusting. However, the term “‘abandoning’” seems to imply that it would not be an option for any survivor, even if she or he requested it. I do not know under what circumstances a survivor would want mediation, but I don’t think a school should bar a survivor from using any method she or he thinks she or he needs to help heal. I am doubtful many survivors would choose mediation, but in the event they do they should be able to control how their case is concluded in any way they see fit.

Anyway, all in all, Jaclyn wrote a fantastic article I suggest you all take a look at. If you get a chance to read it, let me know your thoughts in comments.

Woman doesn’t consent, but jury finds consent anyway

**Trigger warning: Sexual assault**

A St. Louis Circuit Court jury decided against a woman who brought a lawsuit against the company responsible for a "Girls Gone Wild" video that she appeared in years ago without her knowledge. This woman claimed that she had not given consent to appear in the video.
A jury on Thursday rejected a young woman's claim that the producers of a "Girls Gone Wild" video damaged her reputation by showing her tank top being pulled down by another person in a Laclede's Landing bar.


A St. Louis Circuit Court jury deliberated 90 minutes before ruling against the woman, 26, on the third day of the trial. Lawyers on both sides argued the key issue was consent, with her side saying she absolutely refused to give it and the defense claiming she silently approved by taking part in the party.
The defense's argument about the woman's consent is absurd and makes the fact that this woman lost this lawsuit extremely troubling. It is classic victim-blaming to claim that because a woman made the decision to be in a certain situation that she also made the decision to be sexually assaulted by a franchise that clearly has some messed up ideas about consent (like it not being necessary at all, or is ok if it includes pressure). It's shocking to me that this held up in court.
But Patrick O'Brien, the jury foreman, told a reporter later that an 11-member majority decided that Doe had in effect consented by being in the bar and dancing for the photographer. In a trial such as this one, agreement by nine of 12 jurors is enough for a verdict.


"Through her actions, she gave implied consent," O'Brien said. "She was really playing to the camera. She knew what she was doing."
And she knew she had not given any kind of acceptable consent to have her top pulled down or to appear in a video.


h/t

My Sluthood, Myself.

Last summer, I suffered the breakup of a relationship that I had thought would be permanent. Now, I’ve been through my share of break-ups, even of quite serious relationships, but nothing ever broke me like this one.

Since then, I’ve had sexual interactions of the orgasmic kind with 9 different people, none of which I was at any time in a committed relationship with.

I’m not telling you this to shock (though I am specifying the number because we all need to get over the whole “OMG! Be ashamed of your NUMBER! It’s either too big or too small!” thing). I’m telling you this because of something else that’s also true about me: I’d really like to be in a long-term, probably monogamous relationship. That’s right, folks, I’m a slut who craves a stable, loving, committed relationship. File me under “Lookin’ fer luv: ur doin it wrong.”

That’s the story we get sold, right? That women who sleep around are destroying their chances at True Love. Something to do with bonding hormones getting all used up? Or is it that we have so little self-esteem that no one could love us? Or maybe it’s that we’re all used candy wrappers or dirty masking tape. I can never remember.

Thing is: I’ve done it the other way. Until my mid-30s, I was largely a serial monogamist. Not for any grand ethical or philosophical reasons – it was just what felt comfortable to me. That’s not to say that I didn’t have some wild adventures in college, or never went to bed with someone on a first date – I did on occasion. It’s just that when I did, I’d often wake up the next day in a relationship. Let me tell you: not the best recipe for partnership bliss.

I’m thinking of one particular instance in which I had what was for me a very painful dry spell: a year and a half in which I barely got to kiss anyone, and didn’t get to do anything other than that at all, sexually speaking, with anyone. It… yeah. Didn’t feel too good. Made me feel like I would never be touched or loved again. Made me feel, in a word, desperate. You know what’s not a great emotional state for making important life decisions? Desperation.

To wit: after this year and a half of nothing, I went to bed with a woman I barely knew on our first date. Nothing wrong with that, we had a great time, and seriously, did I mention a year and a half? The problem came the next morning, when it became obvious that she was much more into me emotionally than I was at that point. Did I tell her that? And potentially get exiled back to my affectionless desert? I bet you know the answer. What followed was a two-year relationship in which we were unhappy for about the last year and a half.

Fast forward through a few more relationships to last fall. As I crawled out of the acute grief stage of my breakup and into the Land of Reboundia, I launched myself somewhat full-throttle into dating. It was comforting to me to find that there were other people I found appealing who felt similarly about me. But each person I’d meet, if there was any kind of a click at all, I’d throw myself at them whole-hog, wanting so badly for them to be The One that proved I wouldn’t have to do die alone with a shriveled-up vagina and no cats. (I’m allergic.) And then (sing this with me if you know the tune), when something would inevitably go wrong, however silly or minor, however nascent the connection was, it would feel overwhelming. Like I was dying. Like I was broken all over again.

And then a miracle occurred. Via the unlikeliest source of miracles ever: Craigslist Casual Encounters.

I had never thought of my self as a Casual Encounters kind of girl. I’d read them on occasion, sure, out of fascination, horror, horniness. I’d even, once in a long while, in lonely desperate moments, posted an ad, not with the intention of actually meeting anyone, but because sometimes knowing you have a bunch of bad options that you’re rejecting feels better than feeling like you have no options at all. And it was that exact state I found myself in one Friday night last fall, after having been blown apart yet again by some minor rejection that felt so huge it sent me to my bed. I hadn’t showered or shaved or left the house in days. And so, glass of wine in hand, wearing a robe and dirty sweatpants, I posted an ad just so I could watch the replies come in and feel like I had some kind of choice in the world. That somebody wanted me, even if they were gross and I’d never want them back.

And then B. responded. He was smart and charming. His picture looked cute. He seemed like a grown-up, and not like a psycho. He knew how to banter. He made a funny joke about punctuation. And, after a few emails were exchanged, he wanted to know if I’d like to meet him for a drink. That night. Then. And, to my great shock and terror and excitement, I found that I did. (What writer can resist a good punctuation joke?)

The next hour was a blur of furious grooming, during which I kept up the following internal monologue: I’m going to get axe murdered. I’m going to get axe murdered. You don’t have to do this, you can call it off. No, I want to. I can handle myself, I have good instincts and great training. Oh, god, I’m going to get axe murdered…

I’m telling you this because sluthood is scary. Because we’ve been taught to fear it all our lives, and that training doesn’t just go away because we understand the agenda behind it. And because there are real risks involved. Society likes to punish slutty women. And so do a lot of individual men, some of whom frequent Craigslist Casual Encounters.

I left my roommate a note telling her what I’d done and where I was going and to call me at 11 and if I didn’t answer to call the police. (What they were going to do about the fact that her 30-something roommate had gone on a CE date and wasn’t home after two hours I mercifully didn’t wonder at the time.) And then I went down to the local bar and met him.

You’ve probably already guessed that I didn’t get axe murdered. Instead, we spent a lovely hour chatting over a couple of glasses of wine, he used the phrase “male hegemony” critically in a sentence (entirely unprompted by me), and then he asked me if I wanted to go back to his place, which was nearby. And once again, to my shock and terror and excitement, I found that I did. Though not before asking him for his address, calling my roommate with it in front of him, and letting him know I had extensive self-defense training.

Reader, I fucked him. Three rounds worth that night. And it was awesome.

Driving home late that night, I was overcome with an uneasy feeling. What had I just done? What did it mean? What would my friends think? Was this who I wanted to be? I sat in my parked car, paralyzed, for ten minutes that felt like an hour. And then I climbed upstairs, slid into bed, and fell into a troubled sleep.

So much of what changes us in life is accidental. The split-second decision. The whim indulged or squelched. I woke up the next morning feeling unmoored. Like something inside me had been knocked loose, but I didn’t yet know if it was a part I needed, or something that had been in the way. At brunch with friends that day, I nervously let slip about my little adventure, and exhaled as they cheered and pumped me for details. Emboldened by their lack of judgment, I told a few more friends, found more wicked delight.

I’m telling you this because sluthood requires support. Because any woman who indulges these urges carries with her a lifetime of censure and threat. That’s a loud chorus to overcome. A slut needs a posse who finds her exploits almost as delicious as she finds them herself, who cares about her safety and her stories and her happiness but not one whit about her virtue. A slut alone is a slut in difficulty, possibly in danger.

Slowly, I realized. A picture came in to focus. I had the fierce love of my friends. I now knew how to find a lover. And knowing those, I admitted what everyone around me already knew: I wasn’t ready for a new relationship. I couldn’t handle the vulnerability required. It was hurting me too much, too often. But suddenly, it was OK. Suddenly I saw that I didn’t have to keep trying. There were other options.

Of course, things are never as simple as you want them to be. I went back to the CL well trying to find more men like B. with little success. He was, perhaps, a needle in a haystack that I never thought would contain a needle in the first place. There were bushels of disgusting replies, some other flirty email exchanges, a few dates that didn’t make it past the first cocktail, and a scant handful of sexual encounters, only one of which, aside from B., was worth repeating. And even that one fizzled out after a while.

But it didn’t really matter. Because sluthood isn’t an action, it’s a state of mind.

I’m telling you this because sluthood saved me. Sluthood gave me the time and space to nurse a shattered heart. It gave me a place where I could exist in pieces, some of me craving touch, some of me still too tender to even expose to the light. Sluthood healed the part of me that felt my body and my desires were grotesque after two years in a libido-mismatched partnership. Now I felt hot, wanted, powerful. My desire and enthusiasm was an asset, not an unintended weapon. Even now, with more time passed, now, when I am actually ready for and wanting a more emotional connection, sluthood keeps me centered. It keeps me from confusing desire and affection with something deeper. It means I have another choice besides celibacy and settling. It means I won’t enter another committed relationship just to satisfy my basic need for sex and affection. It gives me more choices, it makes room for relationships to evolve organically, to take the shape they will before anyone defines them.

I’m telling you this because, as scary and dangerous as my sluthood is, it’s built on privilege. My paid work will never be in jeopardy because my sluthood is exposed. My work also means I have a lot of practice with direct sexual communication. I’m old enough to be fluent in my own desires and limits, and also old enough that no one expects me to be virginal anyhow, so the risk of stigma is less. I’m cisgender and able-bodied and relatively mentally heathly for now, which makes these assignations a lot easier to mange on multiple levels, I would imagine. I have extensive self-defense training, which assures me I can stay in control of my own safety even in most situations. As a survivor of sexual violence, I’ve been privileged to have access to good long-term therapy and other resources that helped me heal at a deep level. I’m also white, which means that no one expects my behavior to represent my entire race.

I’ve also had some obstacles to overcome. Fat girls don’t have the same pick of partners that smaller women seem to, though I’ve been pleasantly surprised and moved that there are more people out there who are attracted to me than I’d thought. Being a woman who’s “pushing 40” doesn’t exactly expand the pool either. My trauma history means I still have triggers to manage, so I’m a stickler for people who respond respectfully and immediately to direct communication – that rules out many more people than I wish it did, and my instincts on that front are quite good, but not perfect.

In other ways, too, sluthood isn’t always pretty, and I’m not always good at it. Whether from years of habit or something more intrinsic to my personality, my heart seems to want to attach, and after a couple months of playing together casually, and having long, rangey talks naked in bed together between rolls in the hay, it started to with B. Neither of us handled it particularly well. There were tears; there were accusations. But even that was an education: somehow, the conflict that erupted demonstrated so clearly the ways we wouldn’t work together in a more serious arrangement, leaving us free to pick up where we’d left off as lovers. A thread in a needle in a haystack, I suppose.

Meanwhile, via CL and other sources, I’ve had emails and dates and crushes and flings, and one thing that looked like it might get serious and then quite abruptly disappeared. I’ve explored some sexual experiences I’d only fantasized about, and learned which ones are better as fantasies and which ones I want to explore even more. I’ve remembered how much I like pleasure, and how much of it there is in the world. I’ve had to learn how to reject people nicely but clearly, and learn how to appreciate a generous rejection when it’s aimed at me. I’m building my emotional muscles again, and I’m starting to think I could eventually wind up stronger than ever. At the moment, I’ve got another connection simmering over a low flame; not sure yet what it’ll boil down to.

And yes, I still want love. Make that Love. The brass ring. The whole enchilada. A partner in crime, a permanent teammate. A mutual admiration society of two. Someone who feels like home, and who feels the same about me. Someone to catalogue my wrinkles as they form. Whatever you want to call it. When I think about it, it involves monogamy, but who knows. Maybe I’ll find it with someone. Maybe I won’t. I can’t pretend I don’t care. But most days, sluthood helps me be patient. It keeps desperation at bay. It reminds me to enjoy the life I have now, instead of waiting for someone to come start it. It helps me know my heart better, and my libido. It makes me better at communicating about both of them, and much less likely to confuse the two. To my mind, far from ruining me for real love, sluthood is preparing me for it.

I’m not telling you because I think I’ve discovered something new – countless women have certainly known this before me. I’m telling you this because so many people still don’t seem to understand. I’m not telling you this because I think you’re a slut, or should be a slut. I don’t know you. I don’t know what you need, or what you have access to. I’m surely not telling you this out of a desire to expose my private life to the internet. Writing this here means facing the judgment of some members of my family, some colleagues, and other people whose opinion of me matters. It means my ex will probably read this. It means I’ve left this out here for people to find in the future, possibly hurting my life in ways I can’t predict. Surely some of you reading this now will mock me, or criticize me, or give me uninvited advice because you feel like you now know me, or take this as an invitation to hit on me. (Hint: IT’S NOT.)

I’m telling you this because juries still think women who even look like they might possibly be sluts are “asking for it.” I’m telling you this because some people still think it’s OK to drive a teenage girl to suicide because she was probably a slut. I’m telling you this because our policymakers would rather girls get sometimes-fatal diseases than be perceived as condoning sluthood. I’m telling you this because it’s important for everyone to understand: Sluthood isn’t a disease, or a wrong path, or a trend that’s ruining our youth. It isn’t just for detached, unemotional women who “fuck like men,” (as if that actually meant something), consequences be damned. It isn’t ever inevitable that sluthood should inspire violence or shame. Sluthood isn’t just a choice we should let women make because women should be free to make even “bad” choices. It’s a choice we should all have access to because it has the potential to be liberating. Healing. Soul-fulfilling. I’m telling you this because sluthood saved me, in a small but life-altering way, and I want it to be available to you if you ever think it could save you, too. Or if you want it for any other reason at all. And because even if you don’t ever want sluthood for yourself, you’re going to be called upon to support a slut. I’m telling you this because when that happens, I want you to say yes.

(Cross-posted at Yes Means Yes.)

Class Action Against U.S. Military On Behalf Of Sexual Assault Survivors

Just got this news via the fine folks at CounterQuo:

The DC firm, Burke PLLC, is preparing to file a class action suit on behalf of those harmed by the military’s failures to address military sexual trauma. They are interested in speaking with anyone who has been assaulted or raped while in the military or by a member of the military. They plan on filing in the near future so if you know any victims/survivors who may be potentially interested in participating in this lawsuit, please have them contact Susan Sajadi at ssajadi at burkepllc dot com.

If this is you or someone you know, please do get in touch. Here’s some context, from playwright Carolyn Gage:

According to the website of the Military Rape Crisis Center, one in three women in the military will be sexually assaulted. Two out of three women in the military will be sexually harassed. Congresswoman Jane Harmon from California has done the math: “A woman who signs up to protect her country is more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire.”

Over 90% of all females that report a sexual assault are discharged from the military before their contract ends. From the 90%, around 85% are discharged against their wishes. Nearly all 
of the 85% lose their careers based on misdiagnoses that render them ineligible for military service and ineligible for VA treatment 
after discharge.

This case has the potential to not only win some small bit of justice for the victims/survivors that have already suffered at the hands of an (at best) uncaring military (trigger warning on that link), but may also have a real impact on the way the U.S. military policy deals with sexual violence in its ranks, hopefully saving many people from ever being so traumatized.

(Cross-posted at Yes Means Yes)

On “Rape by Deception”

This story about an Arab man being convicted of rape for having consensual sex with a Jewish women is getting a lot of play. Basically, the man said he was Jewish when he wasn’t, the woman had sex with him believing him to be Jewish and a potential romantic partner, and when she found out he wasn’t she filed a criminal complaint for rape and indecent assault. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison. The court reasoned that “If she hadn’t thought the accused was a Jewish bachelor interested in a serious romantic relationship, she would not have cooperated.”

“Rape by deception” or “rape by fraud” can certainly be legitimate. Take, for example, this case, where a woman consented to sex with a man who she believed to be her boyfriend but was actually her boyfriend’s brother (and the brother knew about the mistaken identity). She did not consent to sex with the boyfriend’s brother. The sexual act was consensual insofar as there was no force involved, but it was not a consensual act with that person; and the man involved knew what he was doing and intentionally had sex with someone who was clearly not consenting to have sex with him. The court in that case held that it wasn’t rape, since there was no force — a decision that I think is wrong.

In another Israeli case, a man was convicted of rape by deception for coercing women into sex by pretending to be in a position where he could help them with their social welfare benefits:

In 2008, the High Court of Justice set a precedent on rape by deception, rejecting an appeal of the rape conviction by Zvi Sleiman, who impersonated a senior official in the Housing Ministry whose wife worked in the National Insurance Institute. Sleiman told women he would get them an apartment and increased NII payments if they would sleep with him.

High Court Justice Elyakim Rubinstein said a conviction of rape should be imposed any time a “person does not tell the truth regarding critical matters to a reasonable woman, and as a result of misrepresentation she has sexual relations with him.”

Adding money and social benefits into the mix, and lying about one’s ability to provide those things in exchange for sex, brings the issue to another level, since there is coercion involved. Rape by deception? Yeah, I think so. Point being, there are good reasons to have rape by fraud or rape by deception laws on the books, and we shouldn’t write off the whole concept.

But this latest case is different. The woman did consent to sex with that man. Did he either mislead or possibly lie about some aspect of his identity? Yes (although it’s not clear if he lied and said he was Jewish or just failed to disclose he was Jewish when he knew or should have known that she assumed him to be. He is also married, and apparently either lied about that or failed to disclose it). Is it pretty clear that he’s a huge jerk? Absolutely! But being misled about someone’s ethnicity does not remove the ability to consent. I’m sure she was mad — I’d be mad if I had sex with someone who told me they were a pro-choice feminist lefty when in fact they were an anti-choice religious fundamentalist. But being lied to about things like your religion or ethnicity or belief system should not translate, legally, into a sexual assault charge. There may be justifiable feelings of violation and of course the woman in question should be able to define her experience however she chooses, but a legal standard that allows one to be prosecuted for rape because they concealed or lied about some aspect of their life is very troubling.

Also, in this case? Very racist.

There are also other issues at play when it comes to rape by fraud/deception. There have been cases where people with HIV have been prosecuted for rape by fraud because they did not disclose their status to their partners; those laws, too, have been used simply to target HIV-positive people. And while I have not heard of a case where a trans person has been prosecuted for rape by fraud for having consensual sex and failing to disclose their history, trans people have been civilly sued for fraud simply for publicly identifying as their gender. I wonder what this case could mean for trans people, who even after being murdered are often vilified for allegedly not adequately disclosing their entire history, and whose murderers too often get off on bullshit defenses of “panicking” when they realize they are with a trans person.

In the aftermath of this decision, there’s been some writing around the interwebs about how rape by fraud is always bullshit, and haha I’ve lied about being 5′4″ when I’m actually 5′2″, so am I a rapist? It’s particularly unfortunate that this case is being used as fodder for the proposition that women lie about rape. To be clear, I am not suggesting that the woman in this case lied. Rather, I’m arguing that the Israeli criminal justice system made a serious misstep here; that the man should have been neither prosecuted nor convicted; and that this case creates a series of potential problems.

The reality is that there are certain circumstances where rape by fraud is a legitimate claim. This, though, is not one of them, and opens the door to even greater abuses.